16e small numbers all fail

Author	Message
Conan Send message Joined: 5 Sep 09 Posts: 11 Credit: 4,762,057 RAC: 2,884	Message 2152 - Posted: 28 Apr 2021, 22:11:29 UTC I seem to be no longer able to run the 16e small number work units. They all fail with an exit code of 255, whatever that means. All other work unit types work fine including the 16e work units but not not the small 16e. See work unit 226960709 as an example Thanks Conan ID: 2152 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

shift Send message Joined: 29 Jun 18 Posts: 6 Credit: 972,406 RAC: 655	Message 2153 - Posted: 29 Apr 2021, 21:56:37 UTC - in response to Message 2152. Last modified: 29 Apr 2021, 22:02:44 UTC I've got the same issue. https://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/results.php?userid=455581&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=11 I've stopped that app for now (I believe lasievef small) ID: 2153 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Greg Project administrator Send message Joined: 26 Jun 08 Posts: 645 Credit: 473,009,118 RAC: 261,026	Message 2154 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 15:29:40 UTC - in response to Message 2153. Thanks for reporting the error. The problem WUs have been removed. ID: 2154 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

shift Send message Joined: 29 Jun 18 Posts: 6 Credit: 972,406 RAC: 655	Message 2155 - Posted: 30 Apr 2021, 23:03:56 UTC - in response to Message 2154. Thankyou ID: 2155 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

fzs600 Send message Joined: 7 May 10 Posts: 6 Credit: 17,532,938 RAC: 560	Message 2193 - Posted: 24 May 2021, 5:59:54 UTC - in response to Message 2152. still not resolved Stderr output <core_client_version>7.16.6</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 255 (0xff, -1)</message> <stderr_txt> boinc initialized work files resolved, now working -> ../../projects/escatter11.fullerton.edu_nfs/lasieve5f_1.10_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -> -a -> -f -> 91627000 -> -c -> 1000 -> -R -> ../../projects/escatter11.fullerton.edu_nfs/6p5_1110Lb.poly -> -o -> ../../projects/escatter11.fullerton.edu_nfs/6p5_1110Lb_91627_0_r455265588_0 </stderr_txt> ]]> ID: 2193 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

morgan Send message Joined: 28 Jan 10 Posts: 7 Credit: 8,107,625 RAC: 0	Message 2195 - Posted: 27 May 2021, 13:02:23 UTC - in response to Message 2154. Last modified: 27 May 2021, 13:02:58 UTC Thanks for reporting the error. The problem WUs have been removed. No the problem still exist ! i stopped running my apps last day!! they all is failing! (process exited with code 255) ID: 2195 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Conan Send message Joined: 5 Sep 09 Posts: 11 Credit: 4,762,057 RAC: 2,884	Message 2196 - Posted: 27 May 2021, 23:52:04 UTC It worked for a while but all 16e small work units are failing again. The normal 16e work units work fine as do all other types, just not the 16e small types. Conan ID: 2196 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Dirk Broer Send message Joined: 11 Dec 12 Posts: 17 Credit: 23,724,029 RAC: 13,561	Message 2198 - Posted: 29 May 2021, 0:48:44 UTC On my crunching farm 16e small complete normal, provided they run on one of my Windows systems. On my Linux systems I also get the 255 Error. ID: 2198 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Greg Project administrator Send message Joined: 26 Jun 08 Posts: 645 Credit: 473,009,118 RAC: 261,026	Message 2199 - Posted: 29 May 2021, 4:04:14 UTC - in response to Message 2198. Ah, they're running a job with an octic polynomial. The Linux binaries aren't compiled to support that. It's mostly done, so they should pass soon. Sorry about that. ID: 2199 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

fzs600 Send message Joined: 7 May 10 Posts: 6 Credit: 17,532,938 RAC: 560	Message 2201 - Posted: 29 May 2021, 13:37:46 UTC - in response to Message 2199. Ah, they're running a job with an octic polynomial. The Linux binaries aren't compiled to support that. It's mostly done, so they should pass soon. Sorry about that. so why is a Linux application available if it doesn't work? it's nice to warn us now. ID: 2201 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

arakelov Send message Joined: 21 May 21 Posts: 1 Credit: 1,492,372 RAC: 0	Message 2202 - Posted: 31 May 2021, 20:07:47 UTC - in response to Message 2199. It seems it's working again! ID: 2202 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

fzs600 Send message Joined: 7 May 10 Posts: 6 Credit: 17,532,938 RAC: 560	Message 2203 - Posted: 1 Jun 2021, 5:17:23 UTC - in response to Message 2202. It seems it's working again! yes thanks for the info ID: 2203 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Trotador Send message Joined: 9 May 19 Posts: 1 Credit: 23,276,344 RAC: 0	Message 2239 - Posted: 11 Sep 2021, 7:12:47 UTC - in response to Message 2203. All failing in my linux host ID: 2239 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote