Computation Errors w/ 14e Lattice Sieve 1.08
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
Computation Errors w/ 14e Lattice Sieve 1.08
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 4 Dec 14 Posts: 3 Credit: 8,313,092 RAC: 0 |
Many of my recent tasks (running Windows 7) have immediately resulted in Computation errors. Am I doing something wrong? I have received credit in the past, so I know I can do it. |
Send message Joined: 16 Apr 10 Posts: 2 Credit: 30,820,390 RAC: 14,980 |
I don't think it's you, Ross; I'm seeing the same errors on two different systems. The one with more memory is happily working on 16e tasks, but 14e produces "Computation error" immediately for both. And looking at the statistics at http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/crunching.php, it appears that no work units at all have been successfully processed for GC_2_802, so that's probably the culprit. |
Send message Joined: 4 Dec 14 Posts: 3 Credit: 8,313,092 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for the info. I have two other computers (Ubuntu 12.04, Mint 17) and they seem to be doing OK. I have Windows 7 Professional 32 bit (fully updated) with 4 GB RAM. I captured some messages for more diagnostic info: 12/12/2014 9:05:23 AM | NFS@Home | Resetting project 12/12/2014 9:05:44 AM | NFS@Home | update requested by user 12/12/2014 9:05:48 AM | NFS@Home | Master file download succeeded 12/12/2014 9:05:53 AM | NFS@Home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 12/12/2014 9:05:53 AM | NFS@Home | Requesting new tasks for CPU 12/12/2014 9:05:54 AM | NFS@Home | Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks 12/12/2014 9:05:54 AM | NFS@Home | Resent lost task GC_2_802_41872_3 12/12/2014 9:05:54 AM | NFS@Home | Resent lost task GC_2_802_71456_3 12/12/2014 9:05:56 AM | NFS@Home | Started download of lasieved_1.08_windows_intelx86.exe 12/12/2014 9:05:56 AM | NFS@Home | Started download of GC_2_802.poly 12/12/2014 9:05:57 AM | NFS@Home | Finished download of GC_2_802.poly 12/12/2014 9:05:57 AM | NFS@Home | Started download of banner_290.png 12/12/2014 9:06:25 AM | NFS@Home | Finished download of lasieved_1.08_windows_intelx86.exe 12/12/2014 9:06:25 AM | NFS@Home | Started download of nfs_40.png 12/12/2014 9:06:25 AM | NFS@Home | Starting task GC_2_802_71456_3 12/12/2014 9:06:25 AM | NFS@Home | Starting task GC_2_802_41872_3 12/12/2014 9:06:26 AM | NFS@Home | Finished download of banner_290.png 12/12/2014 9:06:26 AM | NFS@Home | Finished download of nfs_40.png 12/12/2014 9:06:26 AM | NFS@Home | Computation for task GC_2_802_71456_3 finished 12/12/2014 9:06:26 AM | NFS@Home | Output file GC_2_802_71456_3_0 for task GC_2_802_71456_3 absent 12/12/2014 9:06:26 AM | NFS@Home | Computation for task GC_2_802_41872_3 finished 12/12/2014 9:06:26 AM | NFS@Home | Output file GC_2_802_41872_3_0 for task GC_2_802_41872_3 absent I guess I may just abandon doing NSF work on my Windows box, at least for a while. Ross |
Send message Joined: 28 Jan 10 Posts: 7 Credit: 8,107,625 RAC: 0 |
The 14e Lattice Sieve v1.10 also provides error! Linux/Ubuntu OS. |
Send message Joined: 28 Jan 10 Posts: 7 Credit: 8,107,625 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Sep 09 Posts: 218 Credit: 22,841,893 RAC: 3 |
Admin warned. Guys, please post here the content of GC_2_802.poly. Thank you. Carlos |
Send message Joined: 16 Apr 10 Posts: 2 Credit: 30,820,390 RAC: 14,980 |
Here's what I've got in GC_2_802.poly: ----- n: 339262500820772088944568081654603708397695607703731618336703051628430687092805361721615919733260514557432743715342208977060564921427898881979195047644942813722869332683657567347 m: 10889035741470030830827987437816582766592 deg: 6 c6: 12832 c0: -1 skew: 0.207 type: snfs rlim: 135000000 alim: 135000000 lpbr: 31 lpba: 31 mfbr: 62 mfba: 62 rlambda: 2.7 alambda: 2.7 ----- |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 09 Posts: 6 Credit: 79,480 RAC: 0 |
c0 should be +1 /sigh/ Also if it is to be restarted anyway, a better poly would be with c6: 401, c0: 2 and double Y0, double skew |
Send message Joined: 4 Dec 14 Posts: 3 Credit: 8,313,092 RAC: 0 |
First, I'm not sure what a .poly is or where I would find it to post, if a repost of it is even needed. Second, I'm not even sure what Batalov meant or how to do it. OTOH, the more recent tasks I've been getting haven't been the ones which have the immediate failure, so maybe I should just keep calm and NFS on? I have noticed that I aborted some 13 tasks early this morning, as one of my machines had not yet started them but they were beyond the deadline. Still, that machine seems to be doing quite well with the new tasks it's been given. So I guess I'll keep calm. (grin) Ross |
Send message Joined: 26 Sep 09 Posts: 218 Credit: 22,841,893 RAC: 3 |
Ross, This number should be cancelled and the poly updated to correct values as Batalaov says. Right now I don't have access to the database to be willing to make the changes, abort current wus and start new batch. Just keep calm, Greg the admin is very busy and I already contacted Lionel who has access to 14e database. Carlos |
Send message Joined: 11 Dec 12 Posts: 17 Credit: 23,645,935 RAC: 8,479 |
All my 14e WUs error out! 15e, 16e and 16eV5 WUs give no problems. |
Send message Joined: 26 Sep 09 Posts: 218 Credit: 22,841,893 RAC: 3 |
Reported to Admin, poly is wrong. |