Posts by Incognito II
|
1)
Message boards :
NFS Discussion :
Very long post processing
(Message 255)
Posted 27 Nov 2009 by Incognito II Post: Greg, thanks for the reply .. very informative and interesting! Carlos, I do have a couple of I7's with 6GB RAM and a couple of Phenom II's with 8GB RAM. The problem for me would be the hugh file transfers, 40gb's a one time and my ISP would shut me off. :( |
|
2)
Message boards :
NFS Discussion :
Very long post processing
(Message 252)
Posted 26 Nov 2009 by Incognito II Post: Yes, it was back when NFSNet had the automated task system setup. Back when Intel P3's and Athlon T-Birds were top of the line, maybe a few P4's in the mix? Honestly I'm surprized at the number of people running NFS now, but I guess that is BOINC's appeal, you set it up and they will come! :) Anyway, I'm glad to see it doing so well, I just had to give it a shot, at least for a while. |
|
3)
Message boards :
NFS Discussion :
Very long post processing
(Message 250)
Posted 26 Nov 2009 by Incognito II Post: Thanks for the reply Bruce. I was just curious, I ran the old NFSNet projct on a number of machines way back years ago. IIRC, The project leaders at the time were a bit more informative with the details of what was happening in the background/post processing. Actually, as long as you have been working on the Cunningham Tables and with the hardware you have available, I'm surprized you are not helping in the post processing, then again maybe you are doing some of your own? |
|
4)
Message boards :
NFS Discussion :
Very long post processing
(Message 248)
Posted 26 Nov 2009 by Incognito II Post: Greg, who is doing most of the post processing? What type of machines/cluster are being used? Just curious. |