Thread 'The prime factors are wrong'
Message boards : Questions/Problems/Bugs : The prime factors are wrong
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 10 Mar 21 Posts: 50 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
The prime factors in http://pastebin.com/M9z8HzfF (C171_660_1043) are 54259147160015513400521130420708460848245651210270483144839 and 1485336674563622718011814777176343851879921566164542790029380617285288221771774050680252756446835000234270486367, but when I report these two prime factors to factordb, it says that these two primes does not divide the “C171_660_1043” number (171 digits, 1573177803…3079079549, http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000007576206626), and the product of these two primes is a 170-digit “uninteresting” number (8059310120…8235909913, http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000007634345826), maybe the GNFS polynomial is wrong? |
Send message Joined: 10 Mar 21 Posts: 50 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
The correct prime factors are 6078346283854099769513887715088352414739207730274159525875618199 (64 digits) and 25881674549927780834661181082380297664708607029465684452103524592385640817740835852840616796345243365968651 (107 digits), see http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000007576206626 |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 08 Posts: 646 Credit: 480,845,378 RAC: 278,889 |
Should be fixed now. The first half of the original log was correct, but there was a log from another run accidentally included, and those factors were displayed on the webpage. Thanks for pointing it out! |