SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 18 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,474,700 RAC: 0 |
I have just started running NFS@HOME WUs, and I am having problems with instant application crashes. This is on a debian linux 10 system, that is kernel 4.16.0-1. The system is a Ryzen 2700X with 32GB of RAM. In general this system processes all other BOINC-projects I have tried without problems, however this might be too new for NFS@HOME? So I'd be happy about some feedback, either from anyone having similar problems or even better from anyone knowing a fix for the problem. All showing the following message in the STDERR log for the task:
Since is a segmentation violation, i.e. the code performing illegal I/O access, I checked the syslog and all runs leave messages of the type
|
Send message Joined: 31 Oct 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 45,249,104 RAC: 18,416 |
I had the same problem with my 2700X running on Antergos Linux [4.17.3-1-ARCH]. I solved the problem by installing Linux Mint 19 Tara [4.15.0-24-generic|. I've completed 127 tasks with no errors so far but haven't released them to the server yet. Maybe there is an issue with kernels 4.16 and later? |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 18 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,474,700 RAC: 0 |
Maybe there is an issue with kernels 4.16 and later? Yes that might be! As an update: I can process NFS@Home WUs under Ubuntu 18.04 LTS on the same hardware without problems. Software-wise that is a system fairly equivalent to Debian 10. However the kernel is version 4.15.0-20. |
Send message Joined: 31 Oct 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 45,249,104 RAC: 18,416 |
On YAFU, the following solution to a similar issue seemed to work. Configure the bootloader to use the kernel parameter "vsyscall=emulate" |
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 18 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,474,700 RAC: 0 |
Configure the bootloader to use the kernel parameter "vsyscall=emulate" Thank you very much!! That is solving my problem with NFS@Home too :-)! |
Send message Joined: 3 May 19 Posts: 2 Credit: 6,381,050 RAC: 59 |
Hello, it is the same for me. Adding this line is not a solution, just a workaround and doesn't have to be there (for security reason). The real solution is to rebuild the NFS application using a recent glibc. May the dev have a plan for this, as many Linux distribution will have this need in the near future ? |
Send message Joined: 30 Sep 09 Posts: 1 Credit: 12,810,570 RAC: 0 |
Same here, it did the trick, but it is probably not a long term solution. Hope the dev will be able to fix this. Thanks |