Posts by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate]
1)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
14e Sieve Computation error
(Message 2450)
Posted 15 days ago by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: I suggest to concentrate on on both 16 (quicker and higher credit payers) for now, eventually those Wu's erroing out will be done by Linux users or they will be cancelled by the server after 4 errors. |
2)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
14e Sieve Computation error
(Message 2445)
Posted 25 days ago by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: Have warned team. We apologise. Feel free to abort them or untick the 14e application. |
3)
Message boards :
Chat :
Formula BOINC 2024
(Message 2441)
Posted 15 Feb 2024 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: Welcome Timbo. I'll make sure the NFS@Home feeders are aware and your thread is now sticky. |
4)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
No 15e Lattice Sieve for smaller numbers Tasks for a While Now
(Message 2423)
Posted 1 Dec 2023 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: I'll need to check with the guys running ECM on the background, I know they were struggling to find work to feed 15e small queue, however I recommend crushing for 16e v5 and 16e small, specially the former where there is still a lot of Cunningham integers to factor. Would be nice to have a nice boost to 200k Wu's per day in there. BTW, not sure if noticed but it was recently released an update for sub projects apps for CPU's able to run avx512 instructions, but only for linux at the moment. This will give a nice boost. |
5)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
Preferences page selections vs Application page names
(Message 2385)
Posted 25 Apr 2023 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: https://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/forum_thread.php?id=550 |
6)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
WU's failing with EXIT_TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED
(Message 2381)
Posted 4 Mar 2023 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: Back to normal here, just aborting the ones with the highest estimate time. Back to 100% on 16e small, background feeders need some push in there, lots of integers to factor. |
7)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
WU's failing with EXIT_TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED
(Message 2376)
Posted 28 Feb 2023 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: If you have spare memory per thread core I recommend just allowing for 16e Lattice Sieve V5 tasks until Greg sorts this out on his end for the 16e Lattice Sieve for smaller numbers aka .lasievef_small. Under preferences: lasieved - very small numbers, uses less than 0.5 GB memory, work may be infrequently available: no lasievee_small - small numbers, uses up to 0.8 GB memory: no lasievee - medium numbers, uses up to 1 GB memory: no lasievef_small - large numbers, uses up to 1 GB memory: no lasieve5f - huge numbers, uses up to 1.25 GB memory: yes |
8)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
WU's failing with EXIT_TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED
(Message 2374)
Posted 28 Feb 2023 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: Now I'm getting the same issue. This happens with all Wu's with a completion forecast higher than before. It changed from 28 mins to 2h on my case. So on my queue I have a mix of the two. Do we need to rerun the computer Benchmark?! |
9)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
WU's failing with EXIT_TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED
(Message 2368)
Posted 17 Feb 2023 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: Please let me know if it still stands, will have to get admin Greg involved. |
10)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
WU's failing with EXIT_TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED
(Message 2366)
Posted 16 Feb 2023 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: Hi. Go to https://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/prefs.php?subset=global and on the memory section set all to 95%. |
11)
Message boards :
NFS Discussion :
NFS@Home Project Goals
(Message 2360)
Posted 15 Jan 2023 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: State-of-the-art factorizations Siever to use is: lasieve5f (16e credit, 16e Lattice Sieve V5 ),130 credits per wu. Long time goals: "Gang of 31" 2_2222L C228 SNFS 334 Done by yoyo@Home (Jan. 8, 2023) 2_2278M C234 SNFS 343 Done by yoyo@Home (May. 17, 2023) 2_1151+ C236 SNFS 347 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_2206L C243 SNFS 332 Done by NFS@Home (Mar. 10, 2023) 2_1136+ C247 SNFS 342 Done by Wagstaff ECMNET (Sep. 30, 2023) 2_1139+ C248 SNFS 323 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_2246L C253 SNFS 338 Done yoyo@Home (Oct. 25, 2023 p78.c176) (charybdis is tackling the c176 done Oct 30, 2023) 2_2266L C255 SNFS 341 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1108+ C271 SNFS 334 Done by NFS@Home (Apr. 10, 2023) 2_2354M C271 SNFS 354 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_2306L C287 SNFS 347 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1097+ C288 SNFS 331 Done by NFS@Home (Dec. 19, 2022) 2_2222M C289 SNFS 334 Done by NFS@Home (May 2, 2023) 2_2342M C291 SNFS 353 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_2302L C293 SNFS 347 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_2318M C296 SNFS 349 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1163+ C297 SNFS 350 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_2194M C301 SNFS 331 Done by NFS@Home (Feb. 4, 2023) 2_2194L C304 SNFS 331 Done by NFS@Home (Jan. 11, 2023) 2_2378L C305 SNFS 358 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1153+ C306 SNFS 347 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_2374L C309 SNFS 358 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1124+ C311 SNFS 338 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_2354L C314 SNFS 354 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1147+ C317 SNFS 345 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1159+ C318 SNFS 349 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1168+ C326 SNFS 352 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_2398M C326 SNFS 361 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1129+ C330 SNFS 340 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1187+ C334 SNFS 358 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) 2_1123+ C338 SNFS 338 (yoyo@Home doing ECM) Some of the above integers have been enqueued at https://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/y_status_ecm.php#tabs-2, tab Cunningham. |
12)
Message boards :
NFS Discussion :
NFS@Home Project Goals
(Message 2359)
Posted 15 Jan 2023 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: NFS@Home has a partnership with yoyo@Home (https://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/) where some of the integers are ECM'ed to its optimal before being fed onto the NFS@Home sievers. This happens when a factor is not found. yoyo@Home progress, per project, can be follow up at the following address: https://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/y_status_ecm.php We would like to thank all yoyo@Home users too for their work, keep the factors coming! |
13)
Message boards :
NFS Discussion :
NFS@Home Project Goals
(Message 2358)
Posted 14 Jan 2023 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: lasievef_small work list: Stats Page: https://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/crunching_fs.php 16e_small - GNFS 9-2,323 GNFS 199 AS 19560:i590 GNFS 203 11+9,649L GNFS 201 AS 11040:i10244 GNFS 201 16e_small - SNFS 2,2634L SNFS 264(quartic) 2,2658M SNFS 267(quartic) 7,395- SNFS 268(quartic) 7,395+ SNFS 268(quartic) 4129^79- SNFS 285 4219^79- SNFS 286 W967 SNFS 295 |
14)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
Server down?
(Message 2326)
Posted 21 Aug 2022 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: Under "Computing preferences", set Memory to When computer is in use, use at most 99 % When computer is not in use, use at most 99 % |
15)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
No work, server down, applications
(Message 2324)
Posted 21 Aug 2022 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: Hi all, Thank you so much for your CPU cycles donation, it is much appreciated. Back in 2009 when the project initiated only three applications were available: lasieved (14e Lattice Sieve), lasievee (15e Lattice Sieve) and lasieve5f (16e Lattice Sieve V5). Nowadays we have 2 more, the ones mentioned as smaller numbers. If for some reason you are not getting any more work, most likely due to the fact that some of the server queues are empty, try to select at least those two new applications under your NFS@Home Preferences, like this: Run only the selected applications "lasieved - very small numbers, uses less than 0.5 GB memory, work may be infrequently available: yes lasievee_small - small numbers, uses up to 0.8 GB memory: yee lasievee - medium numbers, uses up to 1 GB memory: yes lasievef_small - large numbers, uses up to 1 GB memory: yes lasieve5f - huge numbers, uses up to 1.25 GB memory: no" By doing this it will definitely get your cores busy with Wu's fitting lower memory systems. Be aware that lasieve5f (16e V5) will require more than 1.2GB/thread. |
16)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
Server down?
(Message 2323)
Posted 21 Aug 2022 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: You're not getting any work because the applications you set to run have the queue empty. I recommend Going to "Preferences for this project" and select to get "lasievef_small" tasks too. |
17)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
About GNFS and SNFS
(Message 2305)
Posted 23 May 2022 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: DSJR9453, Please stop posting nonsense and request for numbers to be sieved when I don't see you deploying any CPU into NFS@Home. You will own the right to complain when I see you helping out with some kWh. From now on all your posts will be deleted and further on you will be blocked if you keep with your current attitude. Kind regards. |
18)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
Can the currently progress shown in pages?
(Message 2300)
Posted 15 May 2022 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: 2,2622L was done under the lasievef_small. |
19)
Message boards :
NFS Discussion :
3,667- is P74 * P202 Question
(Message 2142)
Posted 24 Mar 2021 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: Hi there. You are confused but thank you for your questions. The P stands for prime factor and the number stands for number of digits. The P74 and P202 are unique and are two unknowns. For this case they are represented as below. If you see on the status page another P74 it is not the same as this one. Notation thing and to simplify the results page although you have the link to pastebin for the all post-processing phase. Sat Mar 20 02:17:11 2021 p74 factor: 25359506465081394537400918368811516993503730623239065990152596258171619851 Sat Mar 20 02:17:11 2021 p202 factor: 1230272830905372645155936347582471802810001959890217331006615213107201195904714920966951311311387729777205064177180055078095657461958973281700356722080397000095160208423082302916300621936315289528078031 3,667- means (3^667 - 1) If you have time read this thread: https://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/forum_thread.php?id=549 Bear in mind we are only doing the "2. Sieving for Relations" stage on BOINC, the " 3. Combine Relations" is done on a cluster (we have a grant) and "1. Polynomial Selection" is done externally or by direct known polynomials. More about the project here: https://homes.cerias.purdue.edu/~ssw/cun/ To be honest we need even more power than currently is deployed here but slowly we will progress on the Cunningham project...lol |
20)
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
Are there really that many hosts here ?
(Message 2093)
Posted 16 Aug 2020 by Gigacruncher [TSBTs Pirate] Post: They were when Syracuse university were running the project. What do you need from us so I can get in touch with Greg? |