Thread 'GC_9_257 WU errors?'

Author	Message
Mumps [MM] Send message Joined: 12 Sep 09 Posts: 3 Credit: 137,253,355 RAC: 10,129	Message 1436 - Posted: 8 Oct 2014, 1:22:00 UTC Last modified: 8 Oct 2014, 1:24:15 UTC Looks like the 14e batch of WU's starting with GC_9_257 are all broken. None of my Linux systems have successfully run one of them. Is this something unique to the Linux app? Or maybe just my hosts? :) I'm guessing it's the WU's. :) http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/workunit.php?wuid=33795303 ID: 1436 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Gigacruncher Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 26 Sep 09 Posts: 225 Credit: 24,620,873 RAC: 340	Message 1437 - Posted: 8 Oct 2014, 20:38:38 UTC Admin warned. ID: 1437 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Blurf Send message Joined: 13 Dec 10 Posts: 3 Credit: 839,620 RAC: 0	Message 1439 - Posted: 10 Oct 2014, 21:15:34 UTC Any update please? ID: 1439 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Gigacruncher Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 26 Sep 09 Posts: 225 Credit: 24,620,873 RAC: 340	Message 1446 - Posted: 19 Oct 2014, 18:19:47 UTC The value of c0 in the .poly file was -1, where it should be +1. New batch of work is already queued (GC_9_257b). Problem fixed. Thank you all. Carlos ID: 1446 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote