Project recently started using too much memory?
Message boards :
Questions/Problems/Bugs :
Project recently started using too much memory?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 08 Posts: 644 Credit: 466,988,228 RAC: 145,904 |
I have released workunits for larger factorizations that use the lasievef application. This application uses up to 1 GB of memory. BOINC should not download or start these workunits if there is insufficient memory for them, but there are a few reports that it is. You can manually choose not to run these workunits by deselecting lasievef in NFS@Home preferences in your account. Workunits for the lasievee application will remain available. And, as always, thanks for your contributions! |
Send message Joined: 19 Sep 09 Posts: 17 Credit: 17,974,183 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for the info. |
Send message Joined: 5 Sep 09 Posts: 18 Credit: 63,574 RAC: 0 |
Is there any way to reduce the memory that the programe lasievef use? 1G seems not acceptable for most of the computer I see,but as the number grow bigger,it will be more and more number need to use 16e. |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 08 Posts: 644 Credit: 466,988,228 RAC: 145,904 |
Unfortunately no, not without significantly slowing the computation. I agree that 1GB / core is a lot for most of today's computers, but the good news for those without enough memory to currently run lasievef is that there are enough numbers in the lasievee range to keep the project busy for years. Hopefully in a few years, 1GB/core will be typical. |
Send message Joined: 19 Sep 09 Posts: 17 Credit: 17,974,183 RAC: 0 |
Is there a way to adjust which type of WU's go to which machine of ours? I ask because I have 2 machines that can handle the load of the big 1gig WU's, but 3 that really struggle. |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 08 Posts: 644 Credit: 466,988,228 RAC: 145,904 |
Yes. BOINC allows you to designate profiles called home, school, and work. You can, say, call the computers without sufficient memory "school" computers by viewing the computers on your account, selecting details for the low memory computers, then changing location near the bottom. Then, in your NFS@Home preferences you can add separate preferences for school and disable lasievef in those preferences. Let me know if you have questions. |
Send message Joined: 19 Sep 09 Posts: 17 Credit: 17,974,183 RAC: 0 |
Thanks Greg. :) |
Send message Joined: 2 Oct 09 Posts: 50 Credit: 111,128,218 RAC: 0 |
... BOINC allows you to designate profiles called home, school, and work. You can, say, call the computers without sufficient memory "school" computers by viewing the computers on your account, selecting details for the low memory computers, then changing location near the bottom. Then, in your NFS@Home preferences you can add separate preferences for school and disable lasievef ... On our Xeon cluster(s) the memory use for lasievef on the new target R269 is nowhere near 1Gb: 19 708m 330m 724 R 100.1 0.7 4:51.67 lasievef_1.07_x 19 627m 322m 720 R 100.1 0.7 4:45.84 lasievee_1.07_x which shows lowest priority 19, then virtual memory, then RAM used. I'm switching these from "school" to "work", with the latter profile _only_ accepting lasievef tasks. If sufficiently many other users/computers are set like this, Greg may have to monitor the available tasks (in the server settings) to make sure that we don't run out of lasievef tasks. This hasn't been a problem with few people selecting the "large" or "huge" setting. I'm especially interested in the factors of R269, a number with larger "difficulty" (on the "Status of Numbers" page). These numbers get more extensive ECM pretests, and keeping numbers requiring the 16e siever feasible gives us a larger pool of interesting candidates. -bdodson |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 08 Posts: 644 Credit: 466,988,228 RAC: 145,904 |
One option you can use is to select only lasievef to receive only those tasks, but then select "If no work for selected applications is available, accept work from other applications" so if lasievef does run out of work, then your computer won't be idle. |
Send message Joined: 2 Oct 09 Posts: 50 Credit: 111,128,218 RAC: 0 |
...select "If no work for selected applications is available, accept work from other applications" so if lasievef does run out of work, then your computer won't be idle. Done, thanks. Just to be clear, I'm still banning the 16e siever ("lasievef") from linux machines with 1Gb/core or less memory, as well as on the Windows machines. Task Manager reports 356,172K for 15e ("lasievee"), but there's no reason to risk having boinc being in the way. -bdodson |
Send message Joined: 16 Nov 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 773,246 RAC: 0 |
Wondering why one of my PCs was brought to its knees I just discovered the high memory use. I don't mind doing the work but need a way to stop just NFS processing but not the rest of the projects I'm running. So far I don't see a way to stop just NFS when I sit down and use the PC, without stopping all computation. Is there a way? The undesirable alternative is to stop receiving these WU. Each of my 4 processors is taking a half GB of the 2GB available making the PC almost unusable. Takes me 5 minutes just to get into Boinc Manager to shut it down. Thanks Art |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 08 Posts: 644 Credit: 466,988,228 RAC: 145,904 |
In the BOINC Manager, under Advanced, Preferences, in the Disk and Memory Usage tab, I suggest lowering the memory usage to 50% or lower when the computer is in use and 75% or 80% when the computer is idle. This should cause BOINC to run at most three NFS@Home tasks at a time. If you have another, low memory project also active, BOINC should run one of those in the fourth slot. |
Send message Joined: 17 Sep 09 Posts: 7 Credit: 540,914 RAC: 0 |
In the BOINC Manager, under Advanced, Preferences, in the Disk and Memory Usage tab, I suggest lowering the memory usage to 50% or lower when the computer is in use and 75% or 80% when the computer is idle. This should cause BOINC to run at most three NFS@Home tasks at a time. If you have another, low memory project also active, BOINC should run one of those in the fourth slot. This is another place where a "throttle" on the number of simultaneous project tasks would be very good. Maureen (sp?) at CPDN also was supportive of the idea for their project but Dr. Anderson sadly is not. I think I ran into a problem the other day with too many tasks trying to run at the same time and so I got a whole slew of them that failed because the system was trying to run too many at once, then tried to increase swap memory and the tasks blocked and failed. |
Send message Joined: 16 Nov 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 773,246 RAC: 0 |
In the BOINC Manager, under Advanced, Preferences, in the Disk and Memory Usage tab, I suggest lowering the memory usage to 50% or lower when the computer is in use and 75% or 80% when the computer is idle. This should cause BOINC to run at most three NFS@Home tasks at a time. If you have another, low memory project also active, BOINC should run one of those in the fourth slot. When I started in on distributed computing (Sept 99) the explanation was that SETI would instantly release whatever resources were required when another application needed them. I took this to mean any application, not just user requests for CPU cycles and memory. Until lately that has seemed true. Implicit in your recommendation is that NFS will NOT release resources as needed by user or PC. Is that true, or have I read too much into this? I took the 50% suggestion but set idle memory down from 100 to 95% try that for a time. Regards Art |
Send message Joined: 2 Oct 09 Posts: 50 Credit: 111,128,218 RAC: 0 |
... Just to be clear, I'm still banning the 16e siever Lots of other users seem to have taken this view as well, with server status sometimes showing < 4000 "16e results in progress". Recently this has been tending upward, in the 5000's. Today I'm seeing 6,217. I know why I'm back to running these on the linux machines with sufficient resources, but am wondering who/why there's such a strong uptick? A possible reason is that we're currently sieving M899 = 2^899-1, one of the Mersenne numbers. When this one finishes, the next 16e target is another "repunit" R271 = (10^271-1)/(10-1) = 111...1 (271 ones) the next one after the number R269 = 10, 269- from back in Dec. Perhaps these are seen as somewhat higher profile targets than some of the other Cunninghams? Just wondering. -Bruce |
Send message Joined: 27 Dec 09 Posts: 1 Credit: 51,568 RAC: 0 |
Apologies if my terminology is inaccurate. I notice that 2,899- threads running 16e are requesting 1.25 gig of memory (only checked a couple), and I only have 2 gig, so that will slow down processing on my machine (running 2 threads). Not that this will have much impact on the overall scheme of things, but do wonder how many others are in the same boat. |
Send message Joined: 29 Mar 10 Posts: 1 Credit: 10,057 RAC: 0 |
How much Ram do the 14e apps use when work is available? I dont have enough Ram to run the other apps but would love to crunch something. |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 08 Posts: 644 Credit: 466,988,228 RAC: 145,904 |
The 14e app would use up to about 200 MB, but I don't anticipate using it in the near future. The numbers we are currently working on are simply too large for 14e. If you are interested in NFS sieving with 14e, the RSA Lattice Siever project is currently sieving smaller numbers with 14e. |
Send message Joined: 21 Jun 11 Posts: 2 Credit: 6,680,475 RAC: 0 |
I would also point out that Windows 7 uses 1.3GIG on the lasievef 16e tasks and Linux on the same system uses about 800Meg Real and 800Meg Virtual. The two OS's certainly do things differently... I have 12Gig DDR3 in my i7-950 system (8 threads)to support 8 NFS 16e tasks and it uses it for sure! This is running 8 lasievef 16e tasks... Tex1954 |
Send message Joined: 16 Nov 15 Posts: 1 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Hi I am Alan, I just joined the project. I wonder how can I tame the CPU / memory usage as it is taking to much of my resources. I am running on MAC OS Yosemite. Thanks. Please support my project and my old past papers preserving initiative. |