log in

Mac brought to knees by NFS WUs

Message boards : Questions/Problems/Bugs : Mac brought to knees by NFS WUs
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Penguirl
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Sep 11
Posts: 6
Credit: 311,796
RAC: 0
Message 765 - Posted: 21 Nov 2011, 23:38:36 UTC
Last modified: 21 Nov 2011, 23:41:19 UTC

My 2.8GHz QC (eight virtual cores) Mac Pro with 6GB RAM becomes unusable when BOINC is running NFS work units, yet several of the cores show less than 100% usage. I've been just living with it since I joined the project some months ago but that isn't an acceptable long-term solution.

Looking at the nice settings for the WUs they are at 19. Changing them to 20 makes my Mac Pro usable again, but that too is not practical for the long-term.

Is there likely something wrong on my end, or can it be addressed by the project?

FWIW, I believe that eon does the very same thing though I haven't caught it red handed yet.
ID: 765 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Tex1954

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 11
Posts: 2
Credit: 6,680,475
RAC: 0
Message 766 - Posted: 23 Nov 2011, 8:37:36 UTC - in response to Message 765.  
Last modified: 23 Nov 2011, 8:59:02 UTC

Well, you didn't mention what WU's you are running, but with only 6Gig RAM, you would have problems.

The lasievef 16e WU's use up to 1.3GIG of RAM per task! You would have tons of problems running those with so many cores.... even if it did load up the cores, the virtual memory would probably be thrashing to high heaven.

I suggest you check your preferences and make sure you are NOT running those WU's at all. With only 6GIG mem, you may have some trouble running 8 of the smaller tasks as well.

lasieved - rarely used so work is rarely available, only for small numbers: YES
lasievee - work nearly always available, uses up to 0.5 GB memory: YES
lasievef - occasionally used for huge factorizations, uses up to 1 GB memory: NO

Make sure the "lasievef" task is set to "NO" in your project preferences as above.

See this: http://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/forum_thread.php?id=33&nowrap=true#767

Tex1954
ID: 766 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Penguirl
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Sep 11
Posts: 6
Credit: 311,796
RAC: 0
Message 768 - Posted: 27 Nov 2011, 3:35:58 UTC

Thank you for the information and the link. Normally I would have much more RAM but it won't be until next year in this case.

For the project personnel I would suggest a link to the minimum or recommended system requirements on the home page for those considering running NFS.
ID: 768 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Questions/Problems/Bugs : Mac brought to knees by NFS WUs


Home | My Account | Message Boards