log in

32 vs 64 bit windows

Message boards : Questions/Problems/Bugs : 32 vs 64 bit windows
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Jason Styve

Send message
Joined: 21 Sep 10
Posts: 2
Credit: 105,481
RAC: 0
Message 593 - Posted: 28 Sep 2010, 22:12:09 UTC

Just wondering if there is much if any improvement in switching to 64-bit windows-xp or win7-64 over winxp32
ID: 593 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Greg
Project administrator

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 08
Posts: 645
Credit: 473,009,118
RAC: 261,026
Message 594 - Posted: 29 Sep 2010, 0:48:28 UTC - in response to Message 593.  

The same binary will be used, so if the current workunits are running well for you there will be no improvement. However, if you are having malloc errors for the larger workunits even though you have 1.25-1.5 GB/core, Windows 7 does a better job allocating large amounts of memory so those errors may go away.
ID: 594 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Jason Styve

Send message
Joined: 21 Sep 10
Posts: 2
Credit: 105,481
RAC: 0
Message 595 - Posted: 29 Sep 2010, 1:02:10 UTC - in response to Message 594.  

Greg,

Thanks for the response, I know for some applications 64-bit is faster than 32-bit, just wasn't sure if it applied here. Worth the upgrade etc...

Basically I'm running NFS bionic b/c of the OP comment, I have enough memory when running 3 apps of psp and a 16 nfs, I have 2 GB dedicated to NFS. If there were a OPN specific for NFS I might try to run 2 cores at 3GB of memory and upgrade to 64-bit.

Is there any thoughs of making a OPN specific preference?

ID: 595 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Greg
Project administrator

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 08
Posts: 645
Credit: 473,009,118
RAC: 261,026
Message 597 - Posted: 29 Sep 2010, 8:01:53 UTC - in response to Message 595.  

I generally concentrate on Cunningham composites, which only occasionally overlap with the OPN project such as the recent 3,563-. However, 3,607- was such a perfect match for my goals and a most wanted OPN number, so I decided to do it even though at the time it was not a Cunningham number. It has since been added to the Cunningham tables.
ID: 597 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Questions/Problems/Bugs : 32 vs 64 bit windows


Home | My Account | Message Boards